Letters to the Editor, May 31

‘Death of a Salesman’ still relatable today

Arthur Miller’s greatest and most venerable play has returned yet another time to Broadway. Along with Tennessee Williams, Eugene O’Neill and Edward Albee, they represent the iconic American playwrights of the 20th Century.

“Salesman” opened in 1949 and has been revived via stage and film many times. I first saw it as a film with Lee J. Cobb when I was in college in the 1960’s on WCBS-TV’s then “Late Late Show.” I was blown over by its theme and aesthetic quality.

The protagonist, Willy Loman, now in his sixties, has returned from yet another canceled sales trip. He’s become exhausted from his many unrealized attempts to reach the attain his dreams, and one of his two sons, Biff who had shown great promise in high school is also going nowhere.

He goes to his company’s office and speaks to his former boss’s son and asks for improved assignments. His new employer, now a wealthy man, cannot understand Willy’s plight and reduces his schedule. Loman loses his temper and shouts, “Promises were made here!” He is now fired and depends on a friend to supplement his loss of income. (His friend’s son is seen as heading to Washington to argue a case before the Supreme Court. This is juxtaposed to Willy’s son, Biff who, well, is going nowhere.)

This play is now especially salient today, as many due to the economy (yes, even recent college grads) attempt in vain to achieve a dream they thought was theirs. Then, there is serendipity. Timing and just plain luck – at times out of our control – are important factors.

I have seen many versions of the play. I found Frederick March and Dustin Hoffman to be the best. Now the present incarnation: director Mike Nichols chose another Hoffman – Philip Seymour Hoffman. Both Nichols (who has directed many plays and films) and Seymour Hoffman are masterful in their artistic roles. Philip Hoffman doesn’t play his characters – rather, he becomes them. When I saw his film, “Truman Capote,” I didn’t know who the actor was until the final credits.

Then there is Mike Nichols. I saw an hour interview with him on the TimesTalks series. During Nichols’ closing remarks, he commented that Willy Loman was redeemed in the final moments of “Salesman.” Since it had become impossible for him to achieve the American Dream, his death at least brought him peace. And his son Biff was now liberated from Willy’s pressures and now had the potential to be liberated.

David Chowes, PCV

Another thing to learn about Stuy Town

Re: Letter, “In defense of the bird and squirrel feeders,” T&V, May 17

Dear Ms. Freeman:
In your letter to the editor, you wrote that the paper had received a complaint from somebody you assumed was a “miserable, old lady of Stuyvesant Town”, who had objected to feeding the squirrels here.

First of all, Ms. Freeman, F.Y.I., “miserable” and “old” don’t necessarily go hand in hand. I’ve lived in PCV for 53 yrs. and feed the squirrels on occasion. I’ve noticed quite a few other elderly folks enjoying feeding them as well. On the other hand, some residents would rather not.

Keep up the good work of teaching your kids to “love and care for animals.” You may also want to teach them the importance of patience and care toward the elderly, many of whom walk the grounds of PC/ST widowed, disabled, etc. Keep smiling.

Doris Tobin, an “old lady” of PCV

The law is clear, religious and otherwise

Re: Recently published letters to the editor surrounding the contraception debate

The Bill of Rights states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Until recently, this straightforward definition of freedom of religion was accepted by most Americans. Now, by some convoluted logic, there are those who would twist its meaning to support their views and impose their beliefs on the rest of us. In a law abiding society, one cannot choose to obey only those laws with which one agrees, a sort of one from column A, one from column B method.

Applying this logic—what could prevent Orthodox Jews from prohibiting the sale of non-kosher products in supermarkets? Or — chilling possibility — overzealous Muslims from practicing pharia on the women in their families?

Instead, let’s enjoy the freedoms envisioned by the founding fathers, obey the law, and not succumb to the temptation of false argument.

Name withheld, PCV

One thought on “Letters to the Editor, May 31


    Research has demonstrated that the overwhelmingly number of squirrels are not using PCV/ST as their primary residence. Many actually reside, in the main, in contiguous places: Gramercy Park, Union Square, Murray Hill…. Not only that none of them pay any rent.

    So, mangement should use their attorneys to have them permentally removed. The same is true for the birds who spend time here sans permancy or pay any rent.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.