Letters to the Editor, Jan. 24

Code word for age discrimination

New Yorkers over 55 quickly learn the open secret that “overqualified” means “too old.”  The Great Recession has impacted workers of all ages, but seniors and near-seniors have been hit especially hard. New Yorkers age 55 and older who lose their jobs are out of work for an average of one year, compared to 41 weeks for younger employees.

To highlight the value of older employees, last week the City Council passed a resolution I wrote encouraging New York City employers to hire older workers.

Older employees face a longer, more frustrating job search. To give one example: Pamela, now in her mid-fifties was a business manager for nearly three decades when the recession hit. She was laid off and still has not been able to find full-time work. On interviews, Pamela hears the same feedback: her skills are great, but she is “overqualified.” One interview was cut short after Pamela revealed the year she graduated from college.

William is in his mid-sixties and worked in the New York City fashion industry for more than 40 years. Booking jobs has gotten increasingly tough. Employers like his resume, but repeatedly say he is “overqualified.” After 20 interviews without any offers, William has concluded his age is a factor.
Older women and minorities in particular are struggling to find employment. A recent Community Service Society study found that women aged 55 to 64 who are laid off are out of work longer than any other group in New York City. In 2010 the jobless rate for older black and Asian workers was well above the national average. These numbers don’t account for the seniors who give up looking for work, or those forced to take jobs with lower pay and fewer benefits.

Retirement at age 55 is not an option for many Baby Boomers. With pensions shrinking and expenses increasing, more seniors have to continue working to survive. More must be done to help them get back into the workforce.

Part of the solution is changing the way companies view older employees. There is a perception that hiring seniors will cost more and they won’t be able to perform the necessary work. In reality, older workers offer a wealth of experience and opportunities for intergenerational collaboration.  Here in New York, the drugstore chain CVS is trying to attract senior employees by offering classes to help with the online application process. Companies including Google, AT&T and Toys R Us have signed an AARP pledge to recruit workers from across diverse age groups.

Of course, some seniors need more training opportunities to help them re-enter the job market. The New York City Department for the Aging administers the Senior Employment Services (SES) program, also known as Title 5, which helps older workers with computer classes, job placement and on-site training, while they earn a subsidized income. Seventy-nine percent of participants have successfully kept their jobs after the program ended.  But severe cuts in federal funding have left SES with fewer slots and a long waiting list.

To be sure, job creation efforts should benefit New Yorkers of all ages. But with the senior population expected to double over the next 30 years, this group deserves special attention. They’re ready to work; they just need a chance. With the right opportunities and training, older New Yorkers can help shape our 21st century economy in a positive way.

Council Member
Jessica Lappin,
Chair of the City Council’s Aging Committee
Representative of the
Upper East Side
and Roosevelt Island 

Don’t be an egghead

For several late Thursday nights/early Friday mornings, in the recent past, we have been rudely awakened by loud, apparently drunk young people in front of our building, 390 First Avenue.

One would think that calls to Security would be unnecessary since 390 First Avenue is immediately adjacent to the main Security Post at 22nd Street and First Avenue and yet the security person on duty never seems to take the initiative to disperse these hell-raising crowds without first being called.

Recently, at around 2 a.m., an egg was tossed out a window at these rude big mouths, which led to their even louder cursing and threatening remarks.  Nonetheless, the egg seemed to work, and they did leave.
In the future, we can only hope that the security personnel in the 22nd Street kiosk will act to remove these rowdy culprits before being called.

But if not, I suggest we all arm ourselves with an appropriate arsenal of eggs for those late Thursday nights, when we are so rudely awakened by these boisterous, inconsiderate miscreants.

Name withheld, PCV

Obama Claus

Re: Cartoon of “Obama Claus” thanking “47 percenters,” T&V, Dec. 27, 2012
J. Meadows’ cartoon is more proof that conservatives aren’t good at math. Fifty-one percent of the electorate voted for President Obama. That’s a majority. Deal with it.

Bruce Allardice, ST

2 thoughts on “Letters to the Editor, Jan. 24

  1. First of all… I live at 379 First Avenue, and I’ve heard passing commotions at times, but there’s nothing for anyone to do on this block at night, so they just walk by and the noise is done with. The avenue itself is rather loud as well, so that helps mitigate any pedestrian noise, excessive or not. So I don’t know what “egghead” is talking about up there. No one has made any notable noise around here in a year.

    Second, since when is throwing objects out of a high window a proportional response to a noise complaint? Anyone who does that should be arrested and jailed as a criminal. I’m no fan of disruptive packs of kids, but they’re not doing anything illegal… the letter writer above certainly IS doing something illegal. (“An egg was tossed out a window”… I’m guessing that you’re the one who threw it, eh? Sneaky sneaky. People aren’t stupid, you know.)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.