Tenants and owners take their case to RGB

Stuyvesant Town residents sit in the audience at the hearing. On the right is Marietta Hawkes, a 38-year resident who gave testimony. (Photo by Sabina Mollot)

Stuyvesant Town residents sit in the audience at the hearing. On the right is Marietta Hawkes, a 38-year resident who gave testimony. (Photo by Sabina Mollot)

By Sabina Mollot

With the Rent Guidelines Board set to decide on the rent increases for over one million rent stabilized apartments in the city on June 24, tenants from around the city went before the board on Monday, June 8 to ask for a rent freeze or even a rollback. Numerous landlords, mainly those owning small buildings, also testified to ask for higher rents and even supplemental increases for tenants who remain in their buildings for many years. A few City Council members also chimed in to say their constituents are being priced out of their neighborhoods and in some cases harassed by landlords who want to oust them and deregulate their apartments.

The public hearing, held at CUNY’s Graduate Center on 34th Street was one of four taking place around the city. The next and final one before the vote will take place on June 18 from 5-8 p.m. at Brooklyn Borough Hall.

One of the first speakers was a senior from Stuyvesant Town named Marietta Hawkes, who, after 38 years of living in the complex, is paying 45 percent of her income in rent, including three major capital improvement (MCI) increases.

“Due to these increases, I have had to cut back on food and doctor visits,” said Hawkes. She added that other actions by owner CWCapital have had taken a toll on her heath.

“Because of CWCapital’s harassment and frequent apartment inspections for pressurized walls, checking refrigerators, air conditioners, I suffer from insomnia and high blood pressure. Every day I look under the door for papers to see what CWCapital is planning next to harass tenants. Tenants in Stuy Town are being forced out of their homes.”

City Council Member Corey Johnson said in his district, which covers Greenwich Village, “the primary issue” for constituents “is housing.” For that reason he was requesting a rollback.

“Years of increases have left them unable to afford to pay their rent as well as basic expenses,” said Johnson. “Who we are not hearing from is landlords and building managers. Landlords are not calling because their profits have decreased. Landlords are not struggling to put food on the table.”

He then praised board chair Rachel Godsil, saying she was doing “a great job.”

However, his compliment didn’t sit well with one of the board’s owner members, Sara Williams Willard, who commented that it was “inappropriate for a public official to single out” any of the members.

“Please address us as a board,” she added.

Enduring both boos and claps as he spoke was Jack Freund, vice president of owners’ group the Rent Stabilization Association.

Freund informed the nine-member RGB board that the increases they’ve been passing “are not sufficient to meet operating costs.” He mentioned water and sewer increases and property taxes as the main reasons owners’ costs are going up.

“Many middle class tenants do have the ability to withstand a moderate increase, and that’s all we ask for, a moderate increase to invest in old and aging housing stock.”

In April, the board’s preliminary vote was for a zero to two percent increase for tenants signing one-year leases and 0.5 to 3.5 percent for those signing two-year leases.

Ann Korchak, whose family owns a building with a mix of stabilized and market rate tenants, said that the rent she currently brings in just isn’t enough. Meanwhile, the occupants of her building are “well educated professional tenants who were lucky enough to find an apartment when they were apartment hunting many years ago.” Some of them, she’s learned, own vacation homes in Florida. “The noble idea of affordable housing for working families is not being realized on people who won the lottery and pay far below market,” said Korchak.

She added that this year she had to pay $40,000 for a new boiler. In response, tenant member Sheila Garcia asked her if she was planning on charging an MCI “for which you’ll get a six percent increase.” Korchak responded that some applications aren’t necessarily considered eligible. Williams Willard then weighed in to say that Korchak still had to pay for the project before she knew if the MCI application would be approved. “We have to replace it because they need hot water,” Korchak added.

A less responsible owner was the subject of the next person’s testimony, Cheryl Miller of Washington Heights, who said her building hasn’t had cooking gas in three weeks after it was shut off due to a gas leak.

“This could result in another East Village situation,” said Miller, referencing the explosion on Second Avenue in March. “And for all of that they want an increase?” She then asked for a rollback “for those deadbeat landlords.”

Council Member Dan Garodnick also testified to say he thought tenants “need relief.”

He mentioned his constituents in Stuyvesant Town, who “have a big corporate landlord who appropriated (the property) after the largest failed real estate transaction in history. They are not struggling. They are certainly not suffering.”

RBG tenant member Harvey Epstein then asked Garodnick what his thoughts were on the argument that stabilized tenants don’t need their apartments because they have second homes elsewhere. In response Garodnick he didn’t see that as being “the core question.

“You’re always going to have a handful of people who are not in need of a rent stabilized apartment,” he said, “but fundamentally you have so many New Yorkers who need the protection that this board is able to afford to them.”

Garodnick also addressed the issue of property taxes, saying he would be open to having a conversation about “ways to give relief” with regards to property tax or commercial rent tax. This seemed to relieve Williams Willard, who said, “I like the idea of a conversation.”

He was followed by Council Member Margaret Chin who told the board that in her district, which covers Lower Manhattan, “Landlords are buying building after building, just so they can turn them into luxury rentals and their first order of business is to harass the rent stabilized tenants.”

Chin, who said she wanted a rollback, added, “A lot of these landlords, they’re headed by hedge funds and they say, ‘oh, we’re going to improve the building,’ but then they’re doing construction and they don’t care about the tenants. They refuse to renew tenants’ leases and they make buyout offers so they can turn a couple of hundred dollars into a couple of thousand.”

Sharon Canns, a tenants association president of a building on the Upper West Side said in her building, the MCIs were “unstoppable.”

“We’ve had to hire a $350 an hour attorney to fight these MCIs,” she said. Canns added, “I don’t have a house anywhere. I depend on my rent stabilized apartment. I do community work on the Upper West Side. I just want to stay.”

Another tenant couldn’t keep back her tears as she said she understood how owners have rising costs to cover. Edna Ellis, who lives in Harlem, said, “I get it. Small businesses have expenses. But I don’t have any more money. What am I supposed to do?”

Another speaker, who said he owns a building with his uncle, asked for an increase that takes unexpected costs into consideration. Rino Pietanza mentioned that one of his tenants recently became injured and stopped paying rent. “He chose to pay for medicine instead of paying rent; how could we blame him? We let him stay.”

Hal Brill, who introduced himself as “a small owner,” criticized the board for passing increases that he said weren’t keeping up.

“Owner costs always rise,” said Brill. “Real estate taxes, water rates, they’re never rolled back. The RGB has failed in its mission to provide adequate increases in decades. This has resulted in longterm tenants with the lowest rents of all. Multiple generations in an apartment. Their low rents should have supplemental increases in addition to a high RGB increase. The system is skewed against landlords.”

The RGB has so far never voted in favor of a rent freeze, though last year the increases were historically low at one percent for one-year leases and 2.75 percent for two.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

2 thoughts on “Tenants and owners take their case to RGB

  1. Governor Andrew Cuomo (unlike his father) is an ambitious man (in the pejorative sense) and it is clear to me and many others that he has the White House in his sites. For this goal to be realized, he needs big donors (e.g., the real estate interests and Democrats who vote in the primary. His physical absence and silence during this rent stabilization fight may get him money from the billionaires who own property in the state…

    However, the tenants especially in New York City will never forget or forgive him for his ignoring this crisis as governor of the Empire State. OK, so in this Citizens United Supreme Court nation, we use money to elect politicians — including the president. Our founding father would be dismayed by what our elections have devolved into.

    So, Mr. Cuomo, now is the time to choose either special interests or the electorate. Your father was a great man and a great governor. And you don’t come from royalty as your grandparents were owners of a grocery store in Queens who became part of the now dissipating middle class.

    Advise: never dishonor either your principled father nor your hard working grandparents.

  2. I feel like we are living under something like a Feudal System. New York City is no longer even an American city. Foreign investors are buying up property just as a means of laundering their money and the real people of New York City are being treated like serfs. Between foreign oligarchs and ruthless predators like the Speyers, Langone, Fink, et al, our country is taking a a very un-American turn for the worse.

    I don’t know what to make of Cuomo. He is as arrogant and pugnacious as a punch-drunk prize fighter half the time, but then he goes into hiding and refuses to face his “subjects” and his critics the other half the time. Right now, he’s in hiding like the Wizard of Oz. Is this guy schizoid, I wonder? He’s certainly not exhibiting any leadership qualities and makes me wonder why.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.