Topless women in Times Square deserve equality, says Maloney

Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (center), pictured with Christine Quinn, special advisor to the governor, and Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul on Women’s Equality Day, when she was drawn into the debate over desnudas (Photo by Grace Harman)

Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (center), pictured with Christine Quinn, special advisor to the governor, and Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul on Women’s Equality Day, when she was drawn into the debate over desnudas (Photo by Grace Harman)

By Sabina Mollot

Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, who has made equal rights for women a focal point of her legislative career, extended that attitude to the much maligned “desnudas” or topless women in body paint who’ve been hitting up tourists for tips in Times Square.

Last Wednesday, which was Women’s Equality Day, Maloney and Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul, along with a handful of other female elected officials, called for the passage of the Women’s Equality Amendment. At that time, she also told a reporter from the New York Observer she thought the desnudas should be treated the same as male performers like the Naked Cowboy.

That neighborhood is part of Maloney’s district, which covers much of Manhattan’s East Side as well as part of Brooklyn and Queens. Maloney is also now a member of the mayor’s task force that was recently assembled to tackle the issues of legality surrounding the desnudas’ business practices as well as those of the costumed cartoon characters who also pose for pictures with tourists in the neighborhood.

“We have not had our first meeting yet,” she said. For this reason, she declined to share her thoughts on the relatively new practice, other than to say she stood by her sentiment on equal treatment. “The painted women should be treated the same as The Naked Cowboy that apparently runs around half nude,” Maloney said. “They should be treated equally, whatever the requirements are.”

She added that she has never once heard a complaint about the topless women from her constituents. Despite the constant media spotlight on the subject throughout the summer, Maloney said when East Siders approach her, “They complain about bigger things. Economic development, jobs, transit.”

Maloney also offered status updates on various women’s rights related legislation and projects she’s working on.

Her plan to open a museum in Washington devoted to women’s accomplishments was finally passed earlier this year after years of being blocked, despite her commitment to raise the needed funds privately rather than through tax payer dollars. So far $15 million has been raised.

Also passed this year was the creation of a gold coin that will raise money for breast cancer research.

However, another bill that would give women who work for the government two weeks of paid family leave has continued to collect dust.

“I’ve been working on this bill for 15 years and it’s not passed,” said Maloney, who blamed Republicans for blocking it. “Right now you get six weeks of unpaid leave.”

Additionally, she quoted some recent stats that show how badly women are trailing behind men in the workplace. Women only hold five percent of CEO positions in Fortune 500 companies and only 17 percent have board positions. Women also earn approximately 78 percent of what men earn for the same work, costing women $10,800 in lost earnings per year.

On the other hand, noted the Congresswoman, women are working more than ever before.

“Only one fifth of families currently fit the Ozzie and Harriet stereotype of fathers going to work and mothers staying at home,” said Maloney.
She also said for this upcoming presidential election, her support is going to Hillary Clinton, who she also supported during her 2008 run. The two rain into each other twice in just the past week, at two events in the Hamptons. One was a pancake breakfast fundraiser, the other a luncheon for fashion designer Tory Burch.

“She’s asked me to campaign for her in New Hampshire and I’ll be doing that,” Maloney said. “She continues to be the most qualified in the race. She’s served in so many capacities.”

And, Maloney added, “It is refreshing to have a sane candidate.”

She found some kind words for another presidential hopeful, however. On Donald Trump, who’s been successfully hogging the headlines as of late — even in the editorial/letters page of this newspaper — Maloney said, “He’s a New Yorker,” and while chuckling, she added, “He just might be their (Republicans’) nominee. He’s 26 points ahead in the polls.”

Ultimately, she said she’d be asking all the candidates if they support the Equal Rights Amendment.

“When you discriminate against a woman, you discriminate against a family,” said Maloney. “We should find out who’s on our side. (The Equal Rights Amendment) merely says we should have equal rights under the law.”

The amendment, first drafted by Alice Paul in 1923, did finally pass in Congress in 1972, and was sent to the states for ratification. However, by the time the allotted deadline had passed in 1982, the ERA was just three states shy of the 38 ratifications necessary for inclusion in the Constitution. Maloney has introduced the Amendment ten times during her tenure in Congress.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Topless women in Times Square deserve equality, says Maloney

  1. Maloney is a certifiable idiot. These women are prostitutes and drug dealers and degrade women.

    I wonder if Maloney would think it’s ok for us all to go around starkers? If you can flash the top, why not the bottom?

    I hope the three woman in the above photograph don’t choose to go topless. It would NOT be a pretty sight.

  2. Rep, Maloney, though I have a good deal of respect for you, I disagree with your position on topless women. I see this as a continuation of decadence on the road to the end of Western Civilization. But, I will vote for you again in 2016.

  3. FYI, a woman being topless in a PUBLIC place is legal in NYS:

    “In the 1992 case People v. Ramona Santorelli and Mary Lou Schloss, the New York Court of Appeals ruled in favor of two women who were arrested with five others for exposing their breasts in a Rochester park, holding the law void as discriminatory. The ruling was put to the test in 2005, when Jill Coccaro bared her breasts on Delancey Street in New York, citing the 1992 decision, and was detained for twelve hours. She subsequently successfully sued the city for $29,000.”

    This ruling should have been included in the article.

    Now the issues of aggressive panhandling and those rather sleazy (glorified pimps?) handlers of these ““desnudas”, those can be addressed in a variety of law enforcement ways including declaring these TS pedestrian sections as NYC Parks whereby panhandling can be forbidden . As usual, Maloney is clueless regarding this, making it just a woman’s right issue when there is a lot more than that here.

      • David, do you have a problem with the Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court? In the 6–3 ruling the Court struck down the sodomy law in Texas and, by extension, invalidated sodomy laws in 13 other states, making same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state and territory. BTW, heterosexual fellatio and cunnilingus sexual acts, not just anal sex (be it straight/gay) was also classified as sodomy and was prohibited under those state laws as well. Was this decision a decline “in the ethical and moral areas.”?

  4. How about if everyone–male, female, transgender, whatever–had to keep their shirt ON. We could all be equal as well as considerate and civilized.

    • YES! And if anybody thinks that female breasts are on the same sexual arousal level as the male chest (I’m talking nakid here) then I feel sorry for them.

  5. Response to Mr. Dunn’s most recent comment:

    I am not only aware of the Lawrence v. Texas but, I am strongly in favor of it. But, this decision refers to private and not public behavior. Yes, gay sexual behavior, straight fellatio, cunnilingus, and, … are permitted. But not overt heterosexual intercourse and, … are not allowed in the public venue.

    In fact when I was in college in the 1960s, in a speech class, I argued for the elimination of all
    (what was called) “sodomy laws.” Really!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s