Bills take aim at predatory equity

Tenants hold signs at a rally at City Hall, followed by a City Council hearing on legislation aimed at curbing the practice of predatory equity. (Photo by Sabina Mollot)

Tenants hold signs at a rally at City Hall, followed by a City Council hearing on legislation aimed at curbing the practice of predatory equity. (Photos by Sabina Mollot)

By Sabina Mollot

On Halloween, dozens of tenants holding spooky signs rallied at City Hall to bash landlords as vampires if they engage in predatory equity. The event was held prior to a City Council hearing on a package of bills that were aimed at stopping the blood-sucking practice.

Predatory equity is generally defined as when a landlord purchases a property with a high level of debt that could only be expected to be paid if the owner aggressively tries to get rid of rent-regulated tenants and replace them with higher paying ones. Tactics that could be considered aggressive by landlords include harassment via frivolous lawsuits, a lack of basic maintenance, illegal fees, constant buyout offers or construction that’s unsafe or seems gratuitously disruptive.

One of the City Council members pushing legislation, Dan Garodnick, gave the example of Stuyvesant Town’s sale to Tishman Speyer a decade ago as a prime example of predatory equity.

“This is when landlords overpay for buildings with the speculation that they will be able to deregulate units and drive out tenants,” he said. “You’re not making them enough money so they will try anything to get you out of there. This is harassment.”

The other council members pushing bills were Ben Kallos, Ritchie Torres, Vincent Gentile, Helen Rosenthal and Jumaane Willians, who’s also chair of the council’s Housing Committee.

City Council Member Dan Garodnick speaks at a rally alongside Council Members (L-R) Ritchie Torres and Ben Kallos.

City Council Member Dan Garodnick speaks at a rally alongside Council Members (L-R) Ritchie Torres and Ben Kallos.

One of the bills would require the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) to create and maintain a watch list for owners who’ve engaged in predatory activity.

Another bill would establish a presumption – albeit a rebuttable one — of tenant harassment at buildings with a debt service ratio of less than 1.05, along with acts of harassment or neglect by the owner.

Both of those bills are sponsored by Garodnick, Torres and Williams. A third, sponsored by Kallos, would expand an existing HPD program which allows the city to foreclose and sell distressed buildings to pre-qualified third parties. The program would be expanded to include buildings whose owners with large amounts of open building violations.

Another bill, sponsored by Rosenthal, would require HPD to create a list of preferred contractors, taking into account issues like construction conditions and wage theft.

Another bill, sponsored by Gentile, would increase the minimum civil penalty for immediately hazardous illegal conversions from $2,400 to $15,000 in instances of three or more units than what is legally allowed. It certain cases, penalties that go unpaid would make the property eligible for a lien sale.

However, the bills, during the Council hearing, were shot down by a representative of the HPD who gave testimony.

A woman holds a sign depicting an affordable housing graveyard

A woman holds a sign depicting an affordable housing graveyard

Following his arguments about why the bills were either duplicative of regulations or practices currently in existence or why they would simply be near impossible to implement without much more in the way of additional resources, Williams told him, “Next time I’d recommend you submit a big ‘no.’”

In his testimony, Vito Mustaciuolo, HPD Deputy Commissioner for the Office of Enforcement and Neighborhood Services, had said that his department was already “aggressively addressing” complaints of harassment and investigating owners suspected of trying to deregulate units.

But, he argued, not all landlords who are overly optimistic about potential returns end up resorting to harassment and HPD doesn’t have a crystal ball to determine which ones might.

“Trying to make those predictions by tracking financial transactions in which HPD is not a party would be extremely difficult and costly,” Mustaciuolo said. Another obstacle, he added, would be “the perils of predicting real estate markets in general.”

He also said that deciding which owners would belong on a watch list would require access to complete financial information to transactions, which even in official records, isn’t always available. He was also concerned a watch list might be “over-inclusive,” including so many buildings that it would be inaccurate. On the other hand, Mustaciuolo said, in another way the list would be under-inclusive. For example, he said, it’s not just over-leveraged landlords who neglect buildings. Some pay their debts monthly and still allow their properties to fall into disrepair.

Still, he added that the HPD shared the council’s concerns about tenant harassment, and hoped to continue discussions on the issue.

Urban Justice Center attorney and Stuyvesant Town resident Hillary Exter

Urban Justice Center attorney and Stuyvesant Town resident Hillary Exter

Prior to the hearing, at the rally, a few tenants shared horror stories of predatory equity. They included construction in their buildings that’s led to tenants getting respiratory infections, workers squatting in vacant apartments, and refusals by owners to renew tenants’ leases.

An attorney for the Urban Justice Center who’s also a resident of Stuyvesant Town, said there are signals for when construction in a building could be a form of harassment.

“Landlords will do work in an unsafe manner over extended amounts of time,” said the attorney, Hillary Exter. A general lack of oversight in the city, she added, can also lead to landlords lying about conditions. “There needs to be more enforcement,” she said. “The DOB really needs to supervise the way work is being done.”

Advertisements

One thought on “Bills take aim at predatory equity

  1. How does Garodnick say these things with a straight face? Clearly, he knows he really wants anything but what he is saying to happen. The mans pockets are lined with those predators money. Give us a break Dan and just disappear and take the whole corrupt City Council with you. Will your picture be forever enshrined on Corruption Tower?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s