115 apts. in ST/PCV being reconfigured

TA worried about apartments being churned

By Sabina Mollot

Blackstone has recently embarked upon an “experiment” with 115 vacant apartments in Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village that involves adding a new bedroom in most of them by reducing dining or living room space. The plan also will create some new studio apartments.

News of the project was announced on Tuesday by the ST-PCV Tenants Association, which is staunchly opposed to it over concerns it will just add to the “churning” of apartments rented by transients.

Susan Steinberg, president of the Tenants Association, said StuyTown Property Services first shared the plan with the TA about three weeks ago but at that time it had yet to get the greenlight of the Department of Buildings. At this point, however, the city has signed off on the project because the TA has learned construction has already begun.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Details of the apartment conversions were shared in an email that was sent to neighbors along with the TA’s reasons for asking the landlord to scrap the whole project. In particular, Steinberg said, the Tenants Association is opposed to the Stuy Town subdivisions because in Peter Cooper, living rooms are spacious enough where losing some space wouldn’t be as drastic as the conversions in Stuy Town, which, the TA said, effectively turns living rooms into foyers.

According to the email, “The new program will convert 40 vacant Peter Cooper Village units by turning the kitchen of a one-bedroom unit into a bedroom and moving the kitchen into the living room; combining adjacent one- and two-bedroom units to form a three-bedroom unit; and reconfiguring adjacent one- and two-bedroom units to create a three-bedroom unit and a studio. The new program will continue to divide Stuyvesant Town living rooms of 75 vacant apartments to provide an additional bedroom at the expense of living and dining space.”

The Tenants Association went on to blast the plan, saying it “degrades the time-tested, well-designed layout” and “will likely result in an increase in the existing transient rent-a-room lifestyle. This is the antithesis of the original concept of our community. This reconfiguration will most certainly exacerbate the dormitory and churn effects which tenants have been objecting to since subdivision of apartments began. It will add further pressure to our aging infrastructure. It will continue to destabilize our once-cohesive community.”

The TA added Peter Cooper could be the exception in that the impacted units may still attract long-term residents, which, the TA went on to remind the owner, was supposed to be “the stated goal of both management and the Tenants Association.”

Asked about the new apartments, Marynia Kruk, community affairs manager for SPS, said this project is being done in response to renters’ demand for open kitchens and other design features not currently in the buildings as well as affordability.

“We are excited to be able to offer this new product mix at StuyTown and expect it will appeal to a variety of tenants, including families,” Kruk said. “We are doing this in response to feedback we’ve heard consistently from current and prospective tenants who are requesting real bedrooms with closets, open kitchens, and most importantly, affordability. This pilot project is a reaction to that demand, whereas SPS is adapting the floorplans of one percent of the total PCVST apartment count.”

Kruk added that there is now a waitlist for would-be renters of these apartments, although prices have yet to be determined.

However, Rick Hayduk, general manager of ST/PCV, said a converted two-bedroom will be cheaper than a standard one.

“We’re offering product diversity,” he said. “We have 750 square foot two-bedrooms in Stuyvesant Town, which are about the norm (in size) for New York City, but we also have two-bedrooms at 920 square feet, which is very large.”

As for the TA’s concerns about the units contributing to the dormification of the property, Hayduk disagreed.

“Our interests are aligned,” he said. “We too want stability in the community, but we must meet the needs of today’s residents.”

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “115 apts. in ST/PCV being reconfigured

  1. And to think… our mayor, councilman, and TA stood alongside Blackstone less than 18 months ago claiming that the sale was a victory for everyone. DeBlasio, Dan, and the entire TA board knew all along what Blackstone had planned and has planned in the future, but until we have non-corrupt politicians and TA we are screwed.

  2. “We are doing this in response to feedback we’ve heard consistently from current and prospective tenants who are requesting real bedrooms with closets, open kitchens, and most importantly, affordability. This pilot project is a reaction to that demand, whereas SPS is adapting the floorplans of one percent of the total PCVST apartment count.”

    This is the biggest bunch of BS out there. Affordability??? I can only laugh when Blackstone, DeBlasio and Garodnick use this property and affordability in the same sentence. Also, what family would move into an apartment with less living room space?

    The gig is up Rick… you have failed miserably in your 15 months here, and this is the icing on the cake.

  3. ““We are excited to be able to offer this new product mix…”

    That speaks VOLUMES, right there. Product mix. These aren’t people’s homes, they’re a product to be marketed and sold.

    Hey Marynia, Kruk you!

  4. Is this what we are reduced to- people who don’t want a LR or DR and don’t mind a “bedroom” that is no more than a closet with no door..
    Welcome to cool, sophisticated Manhattan, Kids and the
    shylocks who will bleeed you dry of
    every vestige of dignity AND
    steal
    Your wallet!

  5. These changes don’t represent churn. They represent super-churn. A response to just regular churn should have happened 2 or 3 yrs ago. So far as where this is going, any cross-conversation will just result in verbal ping-pong. Tenants says “X”, mgt will just say “Y. The ball’s in your court.” If this doesn’t result in many more students and many more noises complaints, I’m sure we’ll all be more than surprised. BTW, some of the maintenance folks have told me some of what they’ve had to clean up thanks to young revelers, I’m sure many of you have heard or seen too.

  6. It is a farce to think that people have in some way solicited to have only “1%” of the apartments reconfigured. I doubt it is the insiders, who appreciate the living space, and who else but outsider transients would want less living space. Someone is not telling the truth, and we know who it is. It is the money mongers and greedy owners who look for any way, shape, or form to raise rents, for example, Capital Improvements, yeh, right, give me a break, and at the same time reduce quality. Where is our powerful TA and their political influence when we need them!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s