No closet door left unopened
My apartment was recently inspected by CompassRock. Their notification letter was commanding but having no option and nothing to hide anyway, I waited for the day to arrive.
The inspector entered politely, accompanied by a security guard, and immediately informed me that he would also be “looking at” the closets.
Taken aback yet somehow not surprised in this environment of mistrust, I followed him from room to room and he opened the doors himself. The security guard remained inside the front door.
The inspection lasted just a few minutes but, sadly, the negative effects on me have lingered. I approached the inspection in good faith, under the impression they were looking for illegal subdivision of rooms or major structural problems or similar. I consider it a violation of privacy and an insult to my integrity for a total stranger to inspect closets which, as well as utilitarian items, hold personal items.
The community newsletter, which arrived after the inspection, writes of ensuring apartments are in compliance with applicable laws, lease terms and community rules, looking for unsafe conditions, unregistered dogs and compliance with the 80 percent carpet rule. It had never occurred to me that closets fell into this category.
With nearly 25 years of tenancy, I have come to love where I live. For the most part, I welcome the physical and demographic changes, which have taken place. Sadly, my experience with the inspection has left me feeling like some kind of criminal, and has further fostered the culture of unease that successive managements seem to enjoy encouraging. Indeed, a neighbor whose apartment was inspected in their absence with their agreement (but who did not share my feelings), advised me against speaking out for fear of reprisal.
Furthermore, I have now discovered that not all apartment inspections included closets – and not all were conducted by more than one representative.
Eileen Aarons, ST